Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Showing posts with label election. Show all posts
Thursday, November 13, 2008
Friday, October 24, 2008
John McCain agrees and disgrees with you
Western Pennsylvanian's, I think you're all pieces of trash! And I agree with you that you disagree with me that I disagree with terrorist Barack Obama that you are Patriotic and God Loving and Americans! Thanks to Ben Steinberg in NYC for sending this one along:
Thursday, October 23, 2008
President Palin
On Isreal:
On Foreign Policy:
On the bail-out package:
Olbermann Piece on Palin/Bush:
On Abortion:
Why do I find myself looking at clips like this before bed? Is it because I'm a masochist, or because I'm simply terrified of VP or PRESIDENT Palin? It's a relief, not anything more, that McCain seems to now be regretting his decision to cast aside his responsibility of choosing a running mate who is actually capable of being President of the United States. I'm relieved because it indicates that at least some Americans and some Republicans are paying attention.
I wanted to also mention that since arriving in Morocco I have engaged in numerous discussions with Moroccans about the election. It is the very first thing that people ask me when they learn I am an American. The fact that I have not met a McCain supporter yet is secondary in importance to the fact that only about 10% of the population seems to know much about Palin. If more people did, I don't know if I would have been received as kindly here as I have been, representing a powerful country that seems to care less about the people it puts into power.
Can you imagine the public opinion of Islamic nations if Palin were to become President, or even VP? Here is a woman who not only has trouble completing sentences in interviews, but who basically equates Muslims with terrorists. You can say that isn't fair, but in my extensive research into this issue I am yet to find an instance in which Palin mentioned Islam and did not mention terrorism. You win a pat on the back from me and the other readers if you find one.
Okay, time to sleep and dream, hopefully, of a time when America is no longer run by people who think that people of different races and cultures should be feared.
Goodnight
On Foreign Policy:
On the bail-out package:
Olbermann Piece on Palin/Bush:
On Abortion:
Why do I find myself looking at clips like this before bed? Is it because I'm a masochist, or because I'm simply terrified of VP or PRESIDENT Palin? It's a relief, not anything more, that McCain seems to now be regretting his decision to cast aside his responsibility of choosing a running mate who is actually capable of being President of the United States. I'm relieved because it indicates that at least some Americans and some Republicans are paying attention.
I wanted to also mention that since arriving in Morocco I have engaged in numerous discussions with Moroccans about the election. It is the very first thing that people ask me when they learn I am an American. The fact that I have not met a McCain supporter yet is secondary in importance to the fact that only about 10% of the population seems to know much about Palin. If more people did, I don't know if I would have been received as kindly here as I have been, representing a powerful country that seems to care less about the people it puts into power.
Can you imagine the public opinion of Islamic nations if Palin were to become President, or even VP? Here is a woman who not only has trouble completing sentences in interviews, but who basically equates Muslims with terrorists. You can say that isn't fair, but in my extensive research into this issue I am yet to find an instance in which Palin mentioned Islam and did not mention terrorism. You win a pat on the back from me and the other readers if you find one.
Okay, time to sleep and dream, hopefully, of a time when America is no longer run by people who think that people of different races and cultures should be feared.
Goodnight
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Robo-calls
John McCain's fear mongering hit a new depressing low with his sadistic new program of robo-calling undecided voters. The frightening voice on the other line tells those unfortunate enough to answer that Obama works with terrorists to undermine the American government through violent means. John McCain, not his campaign, should be roasted over flames of shame for this assault on our national conscience. Joe Biden is livid, Chris Matthew is beside himself, and people full of Mc-hatred, prejudices and anger are lapping it up. Watch the videos below and let me know what you think. For me, acts of transparent fear-mongering can not be tolerated in our country. It is time for concerned Americans to vocalize their concerns with this development, which can only distract us from our numerous crises and spread unfounded suspicion of our fellow Americans.
Joe Biden:
The Straight-Talk Express:
Chris Matthews:
Joe Biden:
The Straight-Talk Express:
Chris Matthews:
Wednesday, October 1, 2008
Pursuit of Power
In this election we have two candidates who are pursing different policies and visions for our country, but we also have two individuals who are employing contrasting methods in their pursuit of power.
Every human being seeks to both understand and influence the world he lives in, whether through politics or another medium. Obama and McCain are no different. But if we associate, as writer George Sotos has, the pursuit of knowledge with the cognitive function of the mind and the pursuit of influence with the manipulative function, we can detect a valid and crucial distinction between the campaigns and the candidates running them.
Obama’s campaign has been guilty of subtle “untruths”, such as using quotes out of context, but in my opinion, which is all this entry is, Obama has conducted a campaign which reflects a dedicated pursuit of knowledge and a desire to inform the American people about the issues they face. He seems to me to be genuinely interested in educating the public so that we may be able to steer our government and our lives in a positive direction. He has aspirations to shape America and world events, as each President and Presidential hopeful must, but he is a cognitive thinker first and works within the bounds of logical connections between facts and events.
McCain, on the other hand, has engaged in a form of electoral politics dominated by the manipulative function. He has identified, time and time again, the desires of the electorate, and then has sought to shape the facts so that they correspond to those desires. Outcome first, facts second.
This technique was on display most recently this past week as he attempted to position himself as the Maverick crusader who saved the economy. He identified the desire of the American people for economic stability (in this case via a 700 billion dollar injection from the Treasury), and then suspended his campaign and launched a media blitz in an attempt to contort the facts regarding how the bill was passed. His objective was to make it seem as though he led Congress through the process of getting the bill passed, when in fact his position on the legislation was ambiguous throughout.
The technique backfired badly. In the House, his own party rejected the proposal and in the process, made a mockery of McCain surrogates who appeared on talk shows before the vote to proclaim another victory in vision and leadership for the 72 year old.
So, will this latest failure of Carl Rove style, “do anything to win” politics persuade McCain and future Republican nominees to focus on the facts first and the potential influence second? Not a chance! But at the very least it gives Obama more ammunition on the economy while basically wiping out McCain’s illusory, “pro-regulation” arsenal. Perceptive voters may also see in the episode an example of McCain’s erratic governing style and of Obama’s calm under pressure.
Also, not to be overlooked, we now know that McCain, in his old age, is completely incapable of multi-tasking.
Every human being seeks to both understand and influence the world he lives in, whether through politics or another medium. Obama and McCain are no different. But if we associate, as writer George Sotos has, the pursuit of knowledge with the cognitive function of the mind and the pursuit of influence with the manipulative function, we can detect a valid and crucial distinction between the campaigns and the candidates running them.
Obama’s campaign has been guilty of subtle “untruths”, such as using quotes out of context, but in my opinion, which is all this entry is, Obama has conducted a campaign which reflects a dedicated pursuit of knowledge and a desire to inform the American people about the issues they face. He seems to me to be genuinely interested in educating the public so that we may be able to steer our government and our lives in a positive direction. He has aspirations to shape America and world events, as each President and Presidential hopeful must, but he is a cognitive thinker first and works within the bounds of logical connections between facts and events.
McCain, on the other hand, has engaged in a form of electoral politics dominated by the manipulative function. He has identified, time and time again, the desires of the electorate, and then has sought to shape the facts so that they correspond to those desires. Outcome first, facts second.
This technique was on display most recently this past week as he attempted to position himself as the Maverick crusader who saved the economy. He identified the desire of the American people for economic stability (in this case via a 700 billion dollar injection from the Treasury), and then suspended his campaign and launched a media blitz in an attempt to contort the facts regarding how the bill was passed. His objective was to make it seem as though he led Congress through the process of getting the bill passed, when in fact his position on the legislation was ambiguous throughout.
The technique backfired badly. In the House, his own party rejected the proposal and in the process, made a mockery of McCain surrogates who appeared on talk shows before the vote to proclaim another victory in vision and leadership for the 72 year old.
So, will this latest failure of Carl Rove style, “do anything to win” politics persuade McCain and future Republican nominees to focus on the facts first and the potential influence second? Not a chance! But at the very least it gives Obama more ammunition on the economy while basically wiping out McCain’s illusory, “pro-regulation” arsenal. Perceptive voters may also see in the episode an example of McCain’s erratic governing style and of Obama’s calm under pressure.
Also, not to be overlooked, we now know that McCain, in his old age, is completely incapable of multi-tasking.
Friday, September 26, 2008
Sarah Palin Disney Trailer
A friend sent along this clip today. Apparently I wasn't the only one who thought Matt Damon was onto something:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ricky-van-veen/sarah-palin-disney-traile_b_129387.html
(View the Damon interview which spawned this trailer here: http://maxwellshammer.blogspot.com/2008/09/im-with-professor-damon-on-this-one.html)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/ricky-van-veen/sarah-palin-disney-traile_b_129387.html
(View the Damon interview which spawned this trailer here: http://maxwellshammer.blogspot.com/2008/09/im-with-professor-damon-on-this-one.html)
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Hagel Speaks Out Against Palin
I respect Hagel for speaking up for common sense and reason:
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&u_sid=10435997
http://www.omaha.com/index.php?u_page=2835&u_sid=10435997
I'm a Fundamental and So Are You?
John McCain has once again found within himself the ability to morph into an entirely different candidate. Just when you think he might settle on one identity, he slips your grasp, only to pop-up minutes later wearing a new mask and touting a new slogan. First he was the experienced candidate. Then he was the Maverick. Then he was the candidate for change. This time he came out of the phone booth as the barrel-chested, pro-regulation, greed fighting machine; an image he obviously believes appeals to some part of his delusional base.
After 26 years of being consistently and at time even painstakingly anti-regulation, John woke up this morning, looked himself in the mirror and said, "What the heck. What could one day of sane economic principles really do to hurt my chances?" And the answer of course is nothing. This obvious populist pandering will do nothing to harm his chances unless voters start to care about characteristics like honesty, consistency and reliability in their leaders. Most people who do care about those traits are now either firmly in Obama's camp or making the long trek from the outer reaches of the far Right.
And while Barack was making speeches outlining, in detail, his plan for getting our economy back on track, what was McCain doing? Two things: burying his head in the sand by calling for the establishment of a committee and spewing bullshit about Fundamentals.
The former is less insulting to our intelligence as voters than the latter. He should be embarrassed by his inability to offer clear and substantive recommendations to stem this recession. Calling for a commission to be established instead of standing up and leading is a perfect example of what we could expect from a President McCain who is out of touch with reality and therefore unable to address it effectively. The man can't use a computer and can't text, how can we expect him to guide us to safe ground in the 21st century?
Regarding the second activity that John's been dabbling in - spewing bullshit to cover his ass - he's been repeating this line about how "the fundamentals of our economy are still strong" since his campaign began. Barack cited an independent study in his last speech in Colorado which found 16 instances in what McCain has used the line. And now that it has become painfully obvious to any breathing organism on the planet that our economy's core is crumbling, what does McCain do? The only thing he can do; twist his rhetoric. Reality, the son-of-a-gun, had reared its ugly head and stuck its tongue out at him as if to say "You'll never escape me, no matter how hard you try."
So we've now learned from John that the "fundamentals" of the economy are not to be judged by looking at the performance of Wall St. or the international markets or our national debt. Nope. According to John, to see how strong the fundamentals of our economy are all the American worker needs is a mirror. Because we, the employed American citizens, are the fundamentals that John's been talking about this whole time!
How stupid are we?! All this time we've been worrying about Freddie and Fannie and Merrill and Lehman when all we needed to do was hit the bench press, do some squats and then flex. We are strong! We are the economy! The economy is strong! Screw work, I'm going to the gym to get my country back on track!
It's truly a shame that it's come to this. One candidate is out there offering solutions to our worst economic crisis in 70 years while the other is flattering the collective ego of delusional citizens with nonsensical, two-faced remarks.
And they're dead even in the polls. Simply terrifying.
After 26 years of being consistently and at time even painstakingly anti-regulation, John woke up this morning, looked himself in the mirror and said, "What the heck. What could one day of sane economic principles really do to hurt my chances?" And the answer of course is nothing. This obvious populist pandering will do nothing to harm his chances unless voters start to care about characteristics like honesty, consistency and reliability in their leaders. Most people who do care about those traits are now either firmly in Obama's camp or making the long trek from the outer reaches of the far Right.
And while Barack was making speeches outlining, in detail, his plan for getting our economy back on track, what was McCain doing? Two things: burying his head in the sand by calling for the establishment of a committee and spewing bullshit about Fundamentals.
The former is less insulting to our intelligence as voters than the latter. He should be embarrassed by his inability to offer clear and substantive recommendations to stem this recession. Calling for a commission to be established instead of standing up and leading is a perfect example of what we could expect from a President McCain who is out of touch with reality and therefore unable to address it effectively. The man can't use a computer and can't text, how can we expect him to guide us to safe ground in the 21st century?
Regarding the second activity that John's been dabbling in - spewing bullshit to cover his ass - he's been repeating this line about how "the fundamentals of our economy are still strong" since his campaign began. Barack cited an independent study in his last speech in Colorado which found 16 instances in what McCain has used the line. And now that it has become painfully obvious to any breathing organism on the planet that our economy's core is crumbling, what does McCain do? The only thing he can do; twist his rhetoric. Reality, the son-of-a-gun, had reared its ugly head and stuck its tongue out at him as if to say "You'll never escape me, no matter how hard you try."
So we've now learned from John that the "fundamentals" of the economy are not to be judged by looking at the performance of Wall St. or the international markets or our national debt. Nope. According to John, to see how strong the fundamentals of our economy are all the American worker needs is a mirror. Because we, the employed American citizens, are the fundamentals that John's been talking about this whole time!
How stupid are we?! All this time we've been worrying about Freddie and Fannie and Merrill and Lehman when all we needed to do was hit the bench press, do some squats and then flex. We are strong! We are the economy! The economy is strong! Screw work, I'm going to the gym to get my country back on track!
It's truly a shame that it's come to this. One candidate is out there offering solutions to our worst economic crisis in 70 years while the other is flattering the collective ego of delusional citizens with nonsensical, two-faced remarks.
And they're dead even in the polls. Simply terrifying.
Monday, September 8, 2008
Palin's Substance
The McCain camp hasn't allowed Sarah Palin to answer a single question from the media since her nomination. Nevertheless (and possibly as a result), her personal story and charisma have revitalized the GOP over the past week. Her speech at the RNC received rave reviews from both liberal and conservative commentators who commended her for hitting "all the right notes" in her introduction to the nation. It even appears now that "the speech" was so dead-on in its message that it has propelled McCain ahead of Obama for the popular vote, according to CNN's "Poll of Polls".
And who doesn't love a great political speech? We chuckle with each witty quip and jab at the opposition. Some of us clap, some of us hoot and holler, and plenty of us Americans go into chants of USA when the speaker's voice hits a crescendo and an emphatic point is made.
But you know, as much as we value a good speech, we should value the knowledge and vision of a leader more. We should value the substance of a person over the style. Right now, in 2008, American citizens have a crucial responsibility; to vote for those individuals who are capable of solving out country's crises.
How do we, the voters, tell who will be capable of addressing the issues that loom over the '08 Presidential race? We look to their records first, and then we listen. We listen to their answers to tough questions and we see how they either match-up with or conflict with our viewpoints. That's how we decide who to vote for.
So, a news flash for those managing the McCain campaign: The Vice President of the United States becomes President of the United States if the Presdient dies or is otherwise unable to continue serving as Commander in Chief. The Vice President is therefore a rather important post. Given McCain's age (72) and the average life expectancy of American males (75.2), we'd really like to hear Sarah Palin's solutions to our nation's problems. The sooner the better, because we messed up pretty badly the last two times and we want to be sure to get it right in '08.
Sunday, September 7, 2008
Bristol's Right to Choose
Earlier this week Governor Sarah Palin's 17 year old daughter Bristol's pregnancy fell under the national spotlight. The McCain camp's official position is that they were aware of the pregnancy before selecting Palin and considered Bristol's personal life to be outside the bounds of electoral politics; off-limits to the media and hence a non-factor in November. The fact that McCain is anti-abortion and in favor of making that personal decision a matter of state discretion has yet to be picked up on by the visionaries of mainstream news media.
But in retrospect, the McCain camp may have been a step ahead of the game by anticipating the media attention and using it to build sympathy for Palin before her RNC address. Conservative commentators made the media's coverage of Bristol's predicament a central talking point. McCain's spokespeople went out in full force to denounce the media's use of the gender card. Palin topped it off with a direct jab at the media in her acceptance speech. Eh, I'm probably giving them too much credit.
Either way, let's say they knew all about the pregnancy. They alerted McCain and through his own unique cost-benefit analysis The Maverick decided to go with her. With that choice comes a set of new realities for his campaign. One new reality that seems particularly relevant is that Palin, a devout Evangelical, stated in an '06 gubernatorial debate that she opposes abortion even in cases of pregnancies caused by rape. (Read, Palin is dangling off the pro-life edge of the abortion discourse that has raged in this country since Roe v. Wade and seems to surface with renewed strength around election time. Her aggressive pro-life posture is attractive to the Evangelical voting base that elected Bush in 2000 and 2004 but is still hesitant to throw its full weight behind McCain. The GOP VP vetting team put a huge check mark with a halo hovering above it in the row labeled "Views on Abortion" on their list: Palin - Pros and Cons).
And it's Palin's staunch opposition to a woman's right to choose that must make her statement regarding Bristol's decision to keep her child so disheartening for the logically sound, "Can't we get back to the pre-Bush days" Republican who's looking for some straight talk. Here's Sarah and Todd Palin's official statement from September 1st:
"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her
grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and
even prouder to become grandparents."
Proud of Bristol's decision! I think John Stewart put it best when he told Newt Gingrich that, "What she is in essence saying is 'Respect my family's ability to make this decision, and elect me so that I can keep your family from having the same opportunity'."
It's Palin's bold hypocrisy on the issue which should be where Stewart tried to put it; under the media's microscope. Because if there's one thing we can all agree on, it's that four more years of executive level double-talk is the last thing this country needs.
But in retrospect, the McCain camp may have been a step ahead of the game by anticipating the media attention and using it to build sympathy for Palin before her RNC address. Conservative commentators made the media's coverage of Bristol's predicament a central talking point. McCain's spokespeople went out in full force to denounce the media's use of the gender card. Palin topped it off with a direct jab at the media in her acceptance speech. Eh, I'm probably giving them too much credit.
Either way, let's say they knew all about the pregnancy. They alerted McCain and through his own unique cost-benefit analysis The Maverick decided to go with her. With that choice comes a set of new realities for his campaign. One new reality that seems particularly relevant is that Palin, a devout Evangelical, stated in an '06 gubernatorial debate that she opposes abortion even in cases of pregnancies caused by rape. (Read, Palin is dangling off the pro-life edge of the abortion discourse that has raged in this country since Roe v. Wade and seems to surface with renewed strength around election time. Her aggressive pro-life posture is attractive to the Evangelical voting base that elected Bush in 2000 and 2004 but is still hesitant to throw its full weight behind McCain. The GOP VP vetting team put a huge check mark with a halo hovering above it in the row labeled "Views on Abortion" on their list: Palin - Pros and Cons).
And it's Palin's staunch opposition to a woman's right to choose that must make her statement regarding Bristol's decision to keep her child so disheartening for the logically sound, "Can't we get back to the pre-Bush days" Republican who's looking for some straight talk. Here's Sarah and Todd Palin's official statement from September 1st:
"Our beautiful daughter Bristol came to us with news that as parents we knew would make her
grow up faster than we had ever planned. We're proud of Bristol's decision to have her baby and
even prouder to become grandparents."
Proud of Bristol's decision! I think John Stewart put it best when he told Newt Gingrich that, "What she is in essence saying is 'Respect my family's ability to make this decision, and elect me so that I can keep your family from having the same opportunity'."
It's Palin's bold hypocrisy on the issue which should be where Stewart tried to put it; under the media's microscope. Because if there's one thing we can all agree on, it's that four more years of executive level double-talk is the last thing this country needs.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
